A meditation on Cormac McCarthy’s “ugly fact,” Judge Holden, and addressing classical traditions in the American novel.

McCarthy imageHere is a quick meditation on Cormac McCarthy, award-winning author of Blood Meridian and The Road — a writer about whom I have had many conversations recently.

Whenever I study Cormac McCarthy I go back to a statement he made in a 1992 New York Times interview:

“The ugly fact is books are made out of books. The novel depends for its life on the novels that have been written.”

For traces of this maxim in McCarthy’s work, look to his masterpiece, the brutal western epic Blood Meridian, a novel in which esteemed Yale critic Harold Bloom believes McCarthy “attained genius.” The novel features Judge Holden — without question one of the most horrifying characters in the history of the American novel. In many ways the judge is a construct of tradition, and perhaps the single greatest example of McCarthy’s blood meridian imageacknowledgement of literary tradition as a writer. Blood Meridian is an epic and Judge Holden is the hero. The judge is part Melville’s Ahab, part Milton’s Satan, two precedents of heroic evil that McCarthy addresses throughout the novel in order to expand upon philosophically, as they also expanded upon their  predecessors. That function of addressing great works and furthering a perpetual artistic dialogue is an inherent part of the classical paradigm as far back as Homer and the beginning of western poetic and literary traditions. Through the judge, McCarthy’s legitimacy is backed by the totality of epic literary tradition.

In my experience, the extent to which someone values Blood Meridian has something to do with Judge Holden, and the extent to which someone values the judge has a distinct correlation with judge holden imagetheir value of the referential, allusion-heavy style of writing McCarthy employs in constructing him. The purpose of this blog is not to argue one way or the other. To do so inevitably devolves into a statement for or against the canon, which is a tired debate I would just as soon avoid. A more modest goal (and admittedly a more achievable one)is simply to acknowledge that in Judge Holden, and consequently Blood Meridian, Cormac McCarthy demonstrates an irrevocable fact about the nature of the written word and the art form that surrounds it, that nothing is off limits. The seemingly untouchable literary monuments like Moby Dick, Paradise Lost, The Iliad and The Odyssey, are fair game. In other words, the liberty of the writer ought to know no bounds — an idea that might inspire optimism in a time when the general consensus across the world of the Arts is that things are bad, and getting worse.

For a more thorough analysis of Cormac McCarthy’s Blood Meridian, see the two-part lecture given by Amy Hungerford through the Open Yale Courses at: http://oyc.yale.edu/english/engl-291

Also, a collection of McCarthy’s papers are kept as part of the Wittliff / Southwestern Writers collection at Texas State University in San Marcos, Texas.


One thought on “A meditation on Cormac McCarthy’s “ugly fact,” Judge Holden, and addressing classical traditions in the American novel.

  1. Judge Holden is for me one of the most memorable characters I’ve ever come across; in my ever so humble opinion in him McCarthy has created a being beyond human foibles, part god, part Satan frightening and clearly unforgettable.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s